<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>bcr2471</ui>
   <ji>BCJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research article</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase modulates invasion and proliferation and its expression correlates with poor prognosis in breast cancer</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1" ce="yes"><snm>Sun</snm><fnm>Yue</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>sun2@wisc.edu</email></au>
            <au id="A2" ce="yes"><snm>Turbin</snm><mi>A</mi><fnm>Dmitry</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>Dmitry.Turbin@vch.ca</email></au>
            <au id="A3"><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>Kun</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>Ling.Kun@mayo.edu</email></au>
            <au id="A4"><snm>Thapa</snm><fnm>Narendra</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>nthapa@wisc.edu</email></au>
            <au id="A5"><snm>Leung</snm><fnm>Samuel</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>sam.leung@vch.ca</email></au>
            <au id="A6"><snm>Huntsman</snm><mi>G</mi><fnm>David</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>dhuntsma@bccancer.bc.ca</email></au>
            <au ca="yes" id="A7"><snm>Anderson</snm><mi>A</mi><fnm>Richard</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>raanders@wisc.edu</email></au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1"><p>Department of Pharmacology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA</p></ins>
            <ins id="I2"><p>Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre of the Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Room 509, JBRC, 2660 Oak St., Vancouver, BC, V6H 3Z6, Canada</p></ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Breast Cancer Research</source>
         <issn>1465-5411</issn>
         <pubdate>2010</pubdate>
         <volume>12</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>R6</fpage>
         <url>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R6</url>
         <xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">20074374</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/bcr2471</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history><rec><date><day>2</day><month>10</month><year>2009</year></date></rec><revreq><date><day>3</day><month>12</month><year>2009</year></date></revreq><revrec><date><day>4</day><month>1</month><year>2010</year></date></revrec><acc><date><day>14</day><month>1</month><year>2010</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>14</day><month>1</month><year>2010</year></date></pub></history>
      <cpyrt><year>2010</year><collab>Sun et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Introduction</p>
               </st>
               <p>The loss of E-cadherin based cell-cell contacts and tumor cell migration to the vasculature and lymphatic system are hallmarks of metastasis of epithelial cancers. Type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase (PIPKI&#947;), an enzyme that generates phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI4,5P<sub>2</sub>) a lipid messenger and precursor to many additional second messengers, was found to regulate E-cadherin cell-cell contacts and growth factor-stimulated directional cell migration, indicating that PIPKI&#947; regulates key steps in metastasis. Here, we assess the expression of PIPKI&#947; in breast cancers and have shown that expression correlated with disease progression and outcome.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Methods</p>
               </st>
               <p>Using a tissue microarray, we analyzed 438 breast carcinomas for the levels of PIPKI&#947; and investigated the correlation of PIPKI&#947; expression with patient survival via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Moreover, via knockdown of the expression of PIPKI&#947; in cultured breast cancer cells with siRNA, the roles of PIPKI&#947; in breast cancer migration, invasion, and proliferation were examined.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>Tissue microarray data shows that ~18% of the cohort immunostained showed high expression of PIPKI&#947;. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant inverse correlation between strong PIPKI&#947; expression and overall patient survival. Expression of PIPKI&#947; correlated positively with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, which regulates breast cancer progression and metastasis. In cultured breast cancer cells, PIPKI&#947; is required for growth factor stimulated migration, invasion, and proliferation of cells.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusions</p>
               </st>
               <p>The results reveal a significant correlation between PIPKI&#947; expression and the progression of breast cancer. This is consistent with PIPKI&#947; 's role in breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and proliferation.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Introduction</p>
         </st>
         <p>Breast cancer is one of the most significant malignancies of women <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. Despite successful treatment of the primary malignancy, tumors relapse and subsequent metastasis often occur at distant sites, including bone, lung, liver, and brain <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. The presence of breast cancer metastasis significantly influences patients' prognosis. The five-year survival rate from breast cancer drops from 96% to 75% with regional spread, and drops to 20% with distant spread <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. Understanding the molecular mechanism that regulates breast cancer metastasis is critical to developing therapies to treat breast cancer and increase the survival rate; and defining markers that predict metastatic potential will be a key for defining therapeutic approaches.</p>
         <p>Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI4,5P<sub>2</sub>) plays central roles in regulating cell migration, a key step of cancer metastasis, by modulating adhesion turnover and dynamic cytoskeleton rearrangements <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. By interacting with cofilin, PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>regulates the elongation of newly polymerized actin filaments via controlling cofilin cellular distribution and activation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>. Including cofilin, PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>also regulates the reorganization of actin cytoskeleton by associating with other proteins such as &#945;-actinin, WASP/N-WASP, gelsolin, profilin, and villin <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. Furthermore, PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>regulates adhesion turnover by binding to and modulating talin, vinculin, ezrin/radixin/moesin, calpain, and other proteins involved in adhesion dynamics <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase (PIPKI&#947;) is one of the major enzymes in cells that generate PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>by phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol(4)phosphate <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. Via the spatial and temporal control of PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>synthesis<sub>, </sub>PIPKI&#947; plays a key role in multiple biological processes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. Loss of PIPKI&#947; leads to defects of cardiovascular and neuronal development, which is consistent with changes in cadherin function and cell migration <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. PIPKI&#947; is also required for the integrity of the membrane cytoskeleton <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. The PIPKI&#947; is alternatively spliced in cells, resulting in at least two major variants, PIPKI&#947;635 and PIPKI&#947;661 (now named PIPKI&#947;i1 and PIPKI&#947;i2), which differ by a 26 amino acid C-terminal extension <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. The short splicing variant PIPKI&#947;i1 is reported to be a major contributor of the PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>pool that supports G protein-coupled receptor-mediated inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate generation and plays a critical role in Ca<sup>2+ </sup>flux <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. Unlike PIPKI&#947;i1, PIPKI&#947;i2 binds to talin via the 26 amino acid C-terminal extension in a process regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation, targeting PIPKI&#947;i2 to adhesions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. The phosphorylation is mediated by both growth factor receptors and by the non-receptor tyrosine kinase, Src <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. By generating PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>and regulating talin assembly, PIPKI&#947;i2 modulates nascent adhesion formation at the leading edge to facilitate cell migration. Specifically, the PIPKI&#947;i2 regulates epidermal and other growth factor stimulated chemotaxis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>, a process key to intravasation of cancer cells where cells migrate into the vasculature and lymphatic system, a first step in the metastasis of breast cancers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>The loss of E-cadherin cell-cell contacts is a hallmark for the progression of cancers of epithelial origin <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. Remarkably, the PIPKI&#947; also regulates the ability of epithelial cells to assemble E-cadherin-based cell-cell contacts <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. This occurs by an association of PIPKI&#947;i2 with E-cadherin and the recruitment of specific clathrin adaptors required for basolateral and endocytic trafficking by an association with the PIPKI&#947;i2 C-terminus. A loss of PIPKI&#947; expression leads to a loss of E-cadherin targeting to the plasma membrane and a loss of E-cadherin-based cell-cell contacts <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. Thus, PIPKI&#947; regulates the plasma membrane targeting of E-cadherin-based cell-cell contacts and the polarization of epithelial cells. The positioning of the PIPKI&#947; as a regulator of both E-cadherin cell-cell contact assembly and growth factor stimulated cell migration positions the PIPKI&#947; as a key-signaling molecule in physiological functions that are fundamental to the metastasis of cancers of epithelial origin.</p>
         <p>In spite of the increasing evidence indicating that PIPKI&#947; plays a crucial role in cell migration so that it is likely implicated in cancer metastasis, the pathological correlation between the lipid kinase and cancer progression remains uninvestigated. Here, we analyzed breast carcinomas via tissue microarray analyses for the levels of PIPKI&#947; and demonstrated a significant inverse correlation between strong positive PIPKI&#947; expression and overall survival. In addition, the requirement of PIPKI&#947; for the migration, invasion, and growth of breast cancer cells has been confirmed using <it>in vitro </it>models.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Materials and methods</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Antibody</p>
            </st>
            <p>Polyclonal PIPKI&#947; anti-serum was generated from rabbit (Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA) using purified His-tagged PIPKI&#947;. Anti-serum was purified on an affinity column generated by coupling recombinant C-terminus of PIPKI&#947; to cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) as described <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>. The affinity-purified antibody recognizes both PIPKI&#947;i1 and PIPKI&#947;i2.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Constructs</p>
            </st>
            <p>The siRNA sequence targeting PIPKI&#947; is 5'-GGACCUGGACUUCAUGCAG-3'. The sequence of control scrambled siRNA is 5'-GUACCUGUACUUCAUGCAG-3'. Oligonucleotide sequences used for generation of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) specific for PIPKI&#947; were: GCCACCTTCTTTCGAAGAA (PIPKI&#947; shRNA) and GCCTTCTTCGCTAAACGAA (Control shRNA). Generation of replication-defective infectious viral particles and the transduction of the cells were carried out following the protocol provided by Addgene (Addgene Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). In brief, synthesized oligonucleotides were annealed and cloned into HpaI and XhoI sites of pLL3.7 vector (Addgene Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). Stabl3 competent cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used for transformation and DNA purification to minimize the mutagenesis. The integrity of lentiviral vector-containing cloned shRNA sequences were validated by DNA sequencing.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Cell cultures and transfection</p>
            </st>
            <p>MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435S cells were cultured using DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. SKBR3 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS. For siRNA transfection, cells were transfected with Oligofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Patient information and tissue microarrays</p>
            </st>
            <p>A tissue microarray was constructed out of 438 archival invasive breast carcinoma samples at Vancouver General Hospital. These cases were collected between 1974 and 1995. Ethics board approval was obtained for all cases. Patients' demographics, pathological features of the tumors and expression of various biomarkers have been reported previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp>. In brief, median age of the patients at the moment of diagnosis was 61.5 years; median survival time was 11.9 years. Histological distribution included 379 infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 41 infiltrating lobular carcinoma and 8 special types.</p>
            <p>Three tissue microarray blocks were assembled using a manual tissue microarrayer (Beecher Instruments, Inc., Silver Springs, MD, USA) from formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tissue as described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>. Tissue sections (4 &#956;m thick) were cut from the donor blocks and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for tissue review. Representative areas of tumor were circled on the slides and corresponding donor blocks; duplicate 0.6 mm cores were taken from these blocks and inserted into three recipient blocks. Sections (4 &#956;m thick) were cut from the recipient blocks and deparaffinized with CitriSolve and dehydrated through three alcohol changes. Antigen retrieval was performed using a steamer for 30 minutes in 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After that, sections were rinsed with PBS three times for five minutes each time. Hydrogen peroxide and serum free protein block (Dako, Carpenteria, CA, USA) were used to block endogenous peroxidases and prevent non-specific protein binding. Sections were then incubated with anti-PIPKI&#947; antibody (0.5 &#956;g/ml) in a sealed immunochamber overnight at 4&#176;C and Dako Envision anti-rabbit secondary antibody was applied at room temperature for 30 minutes. The NovaRed Substrate Kit (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) was used to visualize the protein. Slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Digital image database</p>
            </st>
            <p>The hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry images of all cores used in this study are publicly available at the companion site <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. The site was constructed using a GPEC database and a Java applet provided by Bacus Laboratories, Inc (Bacus Laboratories, Inc., Lombard, IL, USA). All the slides were scanned with a BLISS scanner (Bacus Laboratories, Inc., Lombard, IL, USA), and posted on the site. WebSlide Browser for Windows (Bacus Laboratories, Inc., Lombard, IL, USA) can be used for viewing preview images of the arrays and images of individual cores.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Cell migration assay</p>
            </st>
            <p>The assays were performed in modified Boyden chamber transwell (Neuroprobe, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) as described <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>. The membrane was pre-coated with type I collagen (10 &#956;g/ml). Per well, 50,000 cells were applied. Chemotaxis assays were performed at 37&#176;C in humidified air with 5% CO<sub>2 </sub>for four hours. Cells migrated through to the underside of the membrane were counted in five high power fields, in a blinded fashion. The migration index for each experiment was calculated as the mean number of cells that migrated toward medium-containing 1% FBS divided by the mean number of cells that migrated toward medium-containing BSA only.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Invasion assay</p>
            </st>
            <p>Matrigel-coated Transwells (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) were incubated with DMEM for four hours and 5 &#215; 10<sup>4 </sup>cells were plated in the upper chambers. The lower chambers contained 1% FBS conditioned DMEM. The inserts were incubated at 37&#176;C in humidified air with 5% CO<sub>2 </sub>for 24 hours. The cells that had invaded the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with 4% polyformaldehyde and stained with 0.2% crystal violet. The number of cells that had invaded was quantified by counting random fields using a light microscope.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Cell proliferation assay</p>
            </st>
            <p>MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435S, or SKBR3 cells infected with lentivirus containing either control shRNA or PIPKI&#947; shRNA were seeded into 12-well culture plates at a density of 1000 cells/well. Then, manual cell counting was performed every two days for eight days.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Statistical analysis</p>
            </st>
            <p>We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using log-rank test to determine differences in survival of the patients with different levels of PIPKI&#947; protein expression. Breslow test was also used to emphasize survival differences in the first 5 to 10 years of the follow up. The alpha level was determined as 5%. All the tests were two-sided. Spearman's correlation was utilized to estimate correlations between PIPKI&#947; protein content with that of other biomarkers and clinical prognostic factors.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Expression of PIPKI&#947; in breast carcinomas</p>
            </st>
            <p>The cellular functions of PIPKI&#947; suggest the potential for roles in epithelial cancer progression. To explore the potential that PIPKI&#947; may correlate with disease progression and outcome we began to assess the content of PIPKI&#947; in a well-characterized tissue microarray of breast cancer patients. For this approach we used well-characterized antibody that specifically detect all splice variants of the PIPKI&#947; as described in Materials and Methods. As a control, PIPKI&#947; expression was knocked down with siRNA (Small interfering RNA) in breast epithelial (MCF10a) or carcinomas cell lines and this resulted in a loss of protein by western blotting and a loss of the immunostaining in these cells <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Normal breast tissues show strong staining for E-cadherin epithelia cells lining the ducts and PIPKI&#947; also shows strong staining of these cells (Figure <figr fid="F1">1a</figr>). To assess how the PIPKI&#947; expression changes within breast cancers we have screened a breast cancer tissue microarray. The expression of PIPKI&#947; in breast carcinomas was demonstrated via tissue microarray that was constructed out of 438 archival invasive breast carcinoma samples at the Vancouver General Hospital <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp>. Of the 438 breast carcinoma represented on the tissue microarray, 330 specimens (75.3%) were considered interpretable. As shown in the lower panels of Figure <figr fid="F1">1a</figr>, in tumors with a loss of E-cadherin there is also a loss of PIPKI&#947; staining. The bottom panel of Figure <figr fid="F1">1a</figr> shows that in a fraction of tumors E-cadherin was expressed but not targeted to the plasma membrane and these tumors also lost PIPKI&#947;. These combined data are shown statistically in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>.</p>
            <tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Correlation of expression of PIPKI&#947; protein with different biomarkers</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Biomarker</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c cspan="3" ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>PIPKI&#947; negative and weak vs. strong staining</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="3">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Spearman's correlation coefficient</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Number of cases</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>E-cadherin negative vs. weak and strong staining</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.106</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.046</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>351</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>ER at 1% cut-off point</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-0.256</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>327</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>PR at 1% cut-off point</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-0.298</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>256</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>EGFR (HER1) negative vs. weak and strong staining</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.262</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.000003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>306</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>HER2/neu</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.171</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>309</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Nottingham Grade</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.185</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>346</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Tumour size</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.025</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.648</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>349</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Nodal status</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.012</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.828</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>314</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; ER = estrogen receptor; HER2 = human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PIPKI&#947; = type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase; PR = progesterone receptor.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
            <fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Expression of PIPKI&#947; in breast carcinomas</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Expression of PIPKI&#947; in breast carcinomas</b>. <b>(a) </b>Shown is H&amp;E, E-cadherin and type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase (PIPKI&#947;) staining of normal breast tissue (top). Breast carcinomas that show a loss of both E-cadherin and membrane PIPKI&#947; (middle). A fraction of carcinomas that show both a mistargeting of E-cadherin and a loss of PIPKI&#947; (bottom). <b>(b) </b>Expression of PIPKI&#947; in breast carcinomas. (Left panel) Representative breast carcinomas stained negative for PIPKI&#947;. (Middle panel) Representative breast carcinomas stained weakly positive for PIPKI&#947;. (Right panel) Representative breast carcinomas stained strong positive for PIPKI&#947;. <b>(c) </b>Immunohistochemical staining of breast tumor tissue for human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-1) and PIPKI&#947;. The panels on the top or on the bottom are from the same tumors. The top panels show strong expression of HER-1 and PIPKI&#947;, whereas the bottom shows weak staining for both antigens.</p>
</text><graphic file="bcr2471-1"/></fig>
            <p>In Figure <figr fid="F1">1b</figr>, examples of the different PIPKI&#947; staining of breast tumors are shown. The slides were scored as 'negative' if no PIPKI&#947; staining was detected, 'weak staining' if there was any amount of weak membranous staining and/or strong membranous staining in less than 50% of tumor cells, and 'strong staining' if there was strong membranous staining in 50% or more carcinoma cells. Among the 358 specimens analyzed, 149 specimens were PIPKI&#947; staining negative (41.6%), 144 specimens were PIPKI&#947; staining weakly positive (40.2%), and 65 specimens were PIPKI&#947; staining strongly positive (18.2%) (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>).</p>
            <tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Number of breast carcinomas cases stained with negative, weakly positive and strong positive PIPKI&#947;</p></caption><tblbdy cols="3">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>PIPKI&#947; staining</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Cases</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>% of total cases</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="3">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>negative</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>149</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>41.6</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>weakly positive</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>144</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>40.2</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>strong positive</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>65</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>18.2</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>PIPKI&#947; = type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Survival analysis</p>
            </st>
            <p>To investigate if PIPKI&#947; tissue content correlates to breast cancer prognosis, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated using PIPKI&#947; antibody staining. As shown in Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>, these curves show that strong positive PIPKI&#947; expression was correlated to poor outcome (Log Rank chi-squared = 6.078, <it>P </it>= 0.014; Breslow chi-squared = 7.454, <it>P </it>= 0.006). It indicates that PIPKI&#947; expression is inversely correlated to the survival of breast cancer patients. To further define the correlation of PIPKI&#947; expression with breast cancer prognosis, patients were stratified based on the lymph node status. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for lymph node negative and lymph node positive. As shown in Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>, there was no significant difference in survival of the patients with PIPKI&#947; strong positive and weak positive or negative tumor in lymph node negative subset (Log Rank chi-squared = 1.01, <it>P </it>= 0.315; Breslow chi-squared = 0.945, <it>P </it>= 0.331). In the lymph node positive subset, the longer term survival difference was not significant in the log-rank test (Log Rank chi-squared = 2.154, <it>P </it>= 0.142, Figure <figr fid="F2">2c</figr>); however, the 5- and 10-year survival rate of PIPKI&#947; strong positive patients is significantly lower than PIPKI&#947; negative or weakly positive patients and had trend towards significance in Breslow test (Breslow chi-squared = 3.267, <it>P </it>= 0.071, Figure <figr fid="F2">2c</figr>). Considering that the median age of the patients at the moment of diagnosis is 61.5 years, the longer-term survival as 20 or 25 years may not clearly reflect the survival of breast cancer because it is very close to the normal average human life limit. The 5- and 10-year survival rate difference supports that PIPKI&#947; expression is inversely correlated to the survival of breast cancer patients.</p>
            <fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PIPKI&#947; staining, with time given in years</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PIPKI&#947; staining, with time given in years</b>. <b>(a) </b>The entire cohort of patients. <b>(b) </b>Lymph node negative patients. <b>(c) </b>Lymph node positive patients. PIPKI&#947; = type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase.</p>
</text><graphic file="bcr2471-2"/></fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Correlation of PIPKI&#947; expression with breast cancer biomarkers</p>
            </st>
            <p>To further characterize PIPKI&#947; expression in breast cancer, Spearman's correlation was used to demonstrate the correlation of PIPKI&#947; expression with clinical characteristics such as lymph nodal status, tumor size and Nottingham tumor grade. As shown in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>, PIPKI&#947; expression does not correlate significantly with lymph nodal status and tumor size. There is a weak significant correlation with the Nottingham grade.</p>
            <p>PIPKI&#947; expression was correlated with the expression of some established breast cancer biomarkers on a tissue microarray. From this analysis there was a correlation between the loss of PIPKI&#947; with loss of E-cadherin expression and plasma membrane targeting. It is consistent with the finding that PIPKI&#947; directly binds to E-cadherin and modulates E-cadherin trafficking <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family receptors are often overexpressed in breast cancers and are used as breast cancer biomarkers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>. Interestingly, our results show that both HER1 (EGFR) and HER2/neu expression are correlated with PIPKI&#947; expression (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). EGFR/HER family receptors play key roles in breast cancer metastasis and their expression are correlated with worse prognostic patient survival rates <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>. The correlation of PIPKI&#947; with EGFR/HER family receptors is consistent with the finding that PIPKI&#947; expression is inversely correlated to the survival of breast cancer patients. In addition, the results of tissue microarrays show that the expression of PIPKI&#947; is inversely correlated to estrogen receptor (ER) and progestin receptor (PR). ER and PR status are important for distinguishing different breast cancer subtypes and they are critical for ER<sup>+ </sup>or PR<sup>+ </sup>breast cancer cell growth <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp>. Our finding is the first time to discover a correlation between PIPKI&#947; with ovarian hormone receptors ER and PR.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>PIPKI&#947; regulates growth factor stimulated breast cancer migration and invasion</p>
            </st>
            <p>Previously, it has been shown that PIPKI&#947; is required for growth factor-induced HeLa (Helen Lane) cell migration <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. As PIPKI&#947; expression is inversely correlated to the survival of breast cancer patients, to regulate cancer cell metastasis might be one of the mechanisms for PIPKI&#947; function in breast cancer. In order to verify this possibility, the effect of PIPKI&#947; knockdown on two breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435S, migration and invasion was demonstrated. As shown in Figure <figr fid="F3">3a</figr>, PIPKI&#947;-specific siRNA could specifically knockdown expression of PIPKI&#947; in MDA-MB-231 or MDA-MB-435S cells, compared with the actin control. The effect of PIPKI&#947;-knockdown on breast cancer cell migration was quantified using a modified Boyden chamber transwell assay. As shown in Figure <figr fid="F3">3b</figr>, the knockdown of PIPKI&#947; blocked migration of both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435S. To investigate the effect of PIPKI&#947;-knockdown on breast cancer cell invasion, a Matrigel invasion assay was used. As shown in Figure <figr fid="F3">3c</figr>, the knockdown of PIPKI&#947; also blocked invasion of both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435S.</p>
            <fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Knockdown of PIPKI&#947; blocks breast cancer cell line migration and invasion</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Knockdown of PIPKI&#947; blocks breast cancer cell line migration and invasion</b>. MDA-MB-231 or MDA-MB-435S cells were transfected with control siRNA, or type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase (PIPKI&#947;) specific siRNA separately as indicated. <b>(a) </b>Expression of PIPKI&#947; and actin were detected by their specific antibodies. <b>(b) </b>FBS (1%) induced migration of MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435S cells. <b>(c) </b>FBS (1%) induced invasion of MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435S cells.</p>
</text><graphic file="bcr2471-3"/></fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>PIPKI&#947; regulates breast cancer cell growth</p>
            </st>
            <p>To further investigate the role of PIPKI&#947; in the pathogenesis of breast cancer progression, lenti-virus-vector-based PIPKI&#947; shRNA was used to establish PIPKI&#947;-knockdown stable cell lines in MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435S, and SKBR3 cells. The knockdown of PIPKI&#947; expression in these stable cell lines was confirmed by western blot as shown in Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>. The effect of PIPKI&#947;-knockdown on breast cancer cell growth was then determined. As shown in Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>, PIPKI&#947;-knockdown decreased cell growth of MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435S, and SKBR3 cells (Figures 4a to c). This result indicates an important role of PIPKI&#947; in breast cancer cell proliferation and is consistent with the finding that PIPKI&#947; expression is inversely correlated to the survival of breast cancer patients.</p>
            <fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>PIPKI&#947; expression is required for rapid cell proliferation in breast cancer cells</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>PIPKI&#947; expression is required for rapid cell proliferation in breast cancer cells</b>. Lentiviral vector was used to generate the stable knockdown of type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase (PIPKI&#947;) in breast cancer cell lines as described in "Material and methods". Decreased expression of PIPKI&#947; was assessed by using PIPKI&#947; specific antibody. Cells infected with either Control short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) or PIPKI&#947; shRNA were seeded into 12-well culture plates at a density of 1000 cells/well. Manual cell counting was performed every two days for the eight days. The cell numbers were counted from at least three wells for each cell type and expressed as mean &#177; standard deviation from one representative experiment. <b>(a) </b>MDA-MB-231 cells. <b>(b) </b>MDA-MB-435S cells. <b>(c) </b>SKBR3 cells.</p>
</text><graphic file="bcr2471-4"/></fig>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Discussion</p>
         </st>
         <p>Here, we have shown that the expression of PIPKI&#947; is inversely correlated to the survival of breast cancer patients, indicating a potential prognostic value of PIPKI&#947;. Consistently, PIPKI&#947; is required for breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and proliferation. All these results support the fact that PIPKI&#947; plays an important role in breast cancer progression.</p>
         <p>Overexpression of the EGFR has been shown to correlate with metastasis and poor prognosis of breast cancer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>. Our results show that EGFR expression is correlated to PIPKI&#947; expression in breast cancer cells, which hints that EGFR and PIPKI&#947; may cooperate to facilitate breast cancer metastasis. Upon EGF stimulation, EGF-induced phosphorylation of PIPKI&#947; causes a disassembly of the phospholipase C-&#947;1-PIPKI&#947; complex and this could enhance PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>accumulation and thus enhances talin assembly into adhesions and this in turn would facilitate the protrusion formation and stabilization of adhesions, which is required for cell migration <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Our results demonstrate that PIPKI&#947; is not only required for breast cancer cell migration but also for breast cancer cell invasion. During invasion, cancer cells form actin-containing protrusions, called invadopodia, that extend into the extracellular matrix and participate in extracellular matrix degradation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>. ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) is a regulator of invadopodia formation and cell invasion <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp> and ARF6 directly activates PIPKI&#947; <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp>. It is plausible that PIPKI&#947; plays a role in invadopodia formation by production of PI4,5P<sub>2 </sub>that regulates actin filament dynamics via cofilin, &#945;-actinin, and vinculin.</p>
         <p>The PIPKI&#947; expression is correlated with E-cadherin in our tissue microarray results. It is consistent with the role of PIPKI&#947; in regulating E-cadherin trafficking. PIPKI&#947; binds directly to E-cadherin and recruits clathrin adaptor complexes AP1B to the E-cadherin-PIPKI&#947; complex and this controls the targeting of E-cadherin to the basolateral membrane <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. The loss of PIPKI&#947; results in the loss of E-cadherin targeting to the plasma membrane and a loss of epithelial cell polarization. The PIPKI&#947;-interacting region in E-cadherin has some overlapping with &#946;-catenin-binding domain <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. PIPKI&#947; may regulate E-cadherin-&#946;-catenin interaction and then modulate &#946;-catenin nuclear translocation. Transactivation of &#946;-catenin correlated significantly with cyclin D1 expression, and that high &#946;-catenin activity significantly correlated with poor prognosis of the patients and was a strong and independent prognostic factor in breast cancer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr></abbrgrp>. PIPKI&#947; may regulate breast cancer progression via E-cadherin-&#946;-catenin signal pathway.</p>
         <p>Breast cancers are heterogeneous in their ER and PR status and display different response to tamoxifen treatment <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>. A study on the cellular phenotypes of breast cancer tumors in 19,541 white women with node-negative disease showed that ER+/PR+ is the most common phenotype of breast cancer constituting 66% of the tumors, followed by ER-/PR- (19%), ER+/PR- (12.5%), and ER-/PR+ (3.4%). Among these different tumors, ER-/PR- tumors are associated with the worst cancer-specific survival and are resistant to tamoxifen treatment <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr></abbrgrp>. Our results show that higher expression of PIPKI&#947; correlates to lower expression of ER and/or PR and correlates to lower patient survival rates. It is consistent with the fact that ER-/PR- tumors are associated with poor breast cancer prognosis. Although it is not clear if PIPKI&#947; could directly modulate ER or PR expression and if PIPKI&#947; could regulate ER or PR signaling, our results provide evidence that PIPKI&#947; correlates with ovarian hormone receptors status. It is worthy to demonstrate the possible role of PIPKI&#947; in regulating ovarian hormone pathways in breast cancer progression.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusions</p>
         </st>
         <p>The inverse correlation between strong PIPKI&#947; expression and overall patient survival is consistent with the finding that PIPKI&#947; is required for breast epithelial cell adherent junction assembly, growth factor stimulated migration, invasion, and proliferation. This study provides evidence of the pathological significance of PIPKI&#947; in breast cancer progression.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Abbreviations</p>
         </st>
         <p>ARF6: ADP-ribosylation factor 6; BSA: bovine serum albumin; DMEM: Dulbecco's modified eagle medium; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; ER: estrogen receptor; FBS: fetal bovine serum; HER: human epidermal growth factor receptor; PBS: phosphate-buffered saline; PI4, 5P<sub>2</sub>: phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PIPKI&#947;: type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase; PR: progesterone receptor; shRNA: short-hairpin RNA.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Competing interests</p>
         </st>
         <p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>YS wrote the manuscript, performed the breast cancer migration and invasion assay. DT performed TMA and analyzed the statistical data and helped to draft the manuscript. KL provided the anti-PIPKI&#947; antibodies and helped to draft the manuscript. NT performed breast cancer proliferation assay. SL helped to perform TMA and analyze the statistical data. DH and RAA are the research group leaders, evaluated the data, edited and approved the final manuscript to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>This work was funded by NIH grants GM057549 and CA104708.</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jemal</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Clegg</snm><fnm>LX</fnm></au><au><snm>Ward</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Ries</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Jamison</snm><fnm>PM</fnm></au><au><snm>Wingo</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Howe</snm><fnm>HL</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RN</fnm></au><au><snm>Edwards</snm><fnm>BK</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/cncr.20288</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15221985</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Alterations of the HBP1 transcriptional repressor are associated with invasive breast cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Paulson</snm><fnm>KE</fnm></au><au><snm>Rieger-Christ</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>McDevitt</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Kuperwasser</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Kim</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Unanue</snm><fnm>VE</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Hu</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Ruthazer</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Berasi</snm><fnm>SP</fnm></au><au><snm>Huang</snm><fnm>CY</fnm></au><au><snm>Giri</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaufman</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Dugan</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Blum</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Netto</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Wazer</snm><fnm>DE</fnm></au><au><snm>Summerhayes</snm><fnm>IC</fnm></au><au><snm>Yee</snm><fnm>AS</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>67</volume><fpage>6136</fpage><lpage>6145</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0567</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17616670</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Future directions in the treatment and prevention of bone metastases</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coleman</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Clin Oncol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>25</volume><fpage>S32</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00000421-200212001-00006</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12562049</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mundy</snm><fnm>GR</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>584</fpage><lpage>593</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nrc867</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12154351</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>A mouse model of human breast cancer metastasis to human bone</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kuperwasser</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Dessain</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Bierbaum</snm><fnm>BE</fnm></au><au><snm>Garnet</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Sperandio</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Gauvin</snm><fnm>GP</fnm></au><au><snm>Naber</snm><fnm>SP</fnm></au><au><snm>Weinberg</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rosenblatt</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>65</volume><fpage>6130</fpage><lpage>6138</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1408</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16024614</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Sentinel lymph node detection and imaging</p></title><aug><au><snm>Keshtgar</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>Ell</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Nucl Med</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>26</volume><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s002590050360</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9933663</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Lymph node metastasis in breast cancer xenografts is associated with increased regions of extravascular drain, lymphatic vessel area, and invasive phenotype</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pathak</snm><fnm>AP</fnm></au><au><snm>Artemov</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Neeman</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Bhujwalla</snm><fnm>ZM</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>66</volume><fpage>5151</fpage><lpage>5158</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1788</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16707438</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Movin' on up: the role of PtdIns(4,5)P(2) in cell migration</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Schill</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Wagoner</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Sun</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>Trends Cell Biol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>276</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tcb.2006.03.007</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16616849</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>The cofilin pathway in breast cancer invasion and metastasis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Eddy</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Condeelis</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>429</fpage><lpage>440</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nrc2148</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17522712</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>EGF-induced PIP2 hydrolysis releases and activates cofilin locally in carcinoma cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>van Rheenen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Song</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>van Roosmalen</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Cammer</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Desmarais</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Yip</snm><fnm>SC</fnm></au><au><snm>Backer</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Eddy</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Condeelis</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au></aug><source>J Cell Biol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>179</volume><fpage>1247</fpage><lpage>1259</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1083/jcb.200706206</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2140025</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18086920</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Regulation of protein activities by phosphoinositide phosphates</p></title><aug><au><snm>Niggli</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.021704.102317</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16212487</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinases put PI4,5P(2) in its place</p></title><aug><au><snm>Doughman</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Firestone</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Membr Biol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>194</volume><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>89</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00232-003-2027-7</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14502432</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type Igamma directly associates with and regulates Shp-1 tyrosine phosphatase</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bairstow</snm><fnm>SF</fnm></au><au><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biol Chem</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>280</volume><fpage>23884</fpage><lpage>23891</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M500576200</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15849189</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Type Igamma661 phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase directly interacts with AP2 and regulates endocytosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bairstow</snm><fnm>SF</fnm></au><au><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Su</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Firestone</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Carbonara</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biol Chem</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>281</volume><fpage>20632</fpage><lpage>20642</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M601465200</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16707488</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Phosphatidylinositol-4,5 bisphosphate produced by PIP5KIgamma regulates gelsolin, actin assembly, and adhesion strength of N-cadherin junctions</p></title><aug><au><snm>El Sayegh</snm><fnm>TY</fnm></au><au><snm>Arora</snm><fnm>PD</fnm></au><au><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Laschinger</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Janmey</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>McCulloch</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Cell</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>3026</fpage><lpage>3038</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1091/mbc.E06-12-1159</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1949369</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17538019</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Type Igamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase modulates adherens junction and E-cadherin trafficking via a direct interaction with mu 1B adaptin</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Bairstow</snm><fnm>SF</fnm></au><au><snm>Carbonara</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Turbin</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Huntsman</snm><fnm>DG</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Cell Biol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>176</volume><fpage>343</fpage><lpage>353</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1083/jcb.200606023</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2063960</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17261850</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase targets and regulates focal adhesions</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Doughman</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Firestone</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Bunce</snm><fnm>MW</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>420</volume><fpage>89</fpage><lpage>93</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature01082</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12422220</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Tyrosine phosphorylation of type Igamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase by Src regulates an integrin-talin switch</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Doughman</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Iyer</snm><fnm>VV</fnm></au><au><snm>Firestone</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Bairstow</snm><fnm>SF</fnm></au><au><snm>Mosher</snm><fnm>DF</fnm></au><au><snm>Schaller</snm><fnm>MD</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Cell Biol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>163</volume><fpage>1339</fpage><lpage>1349</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1083/jcb.200310067</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2173703</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14691141</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>PIP5KI gamma is required for cardiovascular and neuronal development</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Lian</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Golden</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Morrisey</snm><fnm>EE</fnm></au><au><snm>Abrams</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>104</volume><fpage>11748</fpage><lpage>11753</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0700019104</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1913884</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17609388</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Loss of PIP5KIgamma, unlike other PIP5KI isoforms, impairs the integrity of the membrane cytoskeleton in murine megakaryocytes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Litvinov</snm><fnm>RI</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Bach</snm><fnm>TL</fnm></au><au><snm>Lian</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Petrich</snm><fnm>BG</fnm></au><au><snm>Monkley</snm><fnm>SJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Kanaho</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Critchley</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Sasaki</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Birnbaum</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Weisel</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au><au><snm>Hartwig</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Abrams</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Invest</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>118</volume><fpage>812</fpage><lpage>819</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2176194</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18188447</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Type I phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinases. Cloning of the third isoform and deletion/substitution analysis of members of this novel lipid kinase family</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ishihara</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Shibasaki</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Kizuki</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Wada</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Yazaki</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Asano</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Oka</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biol Chem</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>273</volume><fpage>8741</fpage><lpage>8748</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.273.15.8741</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9535851</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Two novel phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate, 5-kinase type I gamma splice variants expressed in human cells display distinctive cellular targeting</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schill</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>Biochem J</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><inpress/></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Critical role of PIP5KI{gamma}87 in InsP3-mediated Ca(2+) signaling</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>YJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>WH</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Xu</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Dong</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Luo</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Yin</snm><fnm>HL</fnm></au></aug><source>J Cell Biol</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>167</volume><fpage>1005</fpage><lpage>1010</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1083/jcb.200408008</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2172614</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15611330</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Recruitment and regulation of phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type 1 gamma by the FERM domain of talin</p></title><aug><au><snm>Di Paolo</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Pellegrini</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Letinic</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Cestra</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Zoncu</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Voronov</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Chang</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Guo</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Wenk</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>De Camilli</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>420</volume><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>89</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature01147</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12422219</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase is required for EGF-stimulated directional cell migration</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sun</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Ling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Wagoner</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Cell Biol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>178</volume><fpage>297</fpage><lpage>308</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1083/jcb.200701078</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2064448</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17635937</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Genetic and epigenetic alterations as hallmarks of the intricate road to cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Macaluso</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Paggi</snm><fnm>MG</fnm></au><au><snm>Giordano</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Oncogene</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>6472</fpage><lpage>6478</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.onc.1206955</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14528270</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase isozymes catalyze the synthesis of 3-phosphate-containing phosphatidylinositol signaling molecules</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Loijens</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Boronenkov</snm><fnm>IV</fnm></au><au><snm>Parker</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Norris</snm><fnm>FA</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Thum</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Prestwich</snm><fnm>GD</fnm></au><au><snm>Majerus</snm><fnm>PW</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biol Chem</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>272</volume><fpage>17756</fpage><lpage>17761</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.272.28.17756</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9211928</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Hierarchical clustering analysis of tissue microarray immunostaining data identifies prognostically significant groups of breast carcinoma</p></title><aug><au><snm>Makretsov</snm><fnm>NA</fnm></au><au><snm>Huntsman</snm><fnm>DG</fnm></au><au><snm>Nielsen</snm><fnm>TO</fnm></au><au><snm>Yorida</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Peacock</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Cheang</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au><au><snm>Dunn</snm><fnm>SE</fnm></au><au><snm>Hayes</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Rijn</snm><mnm>van de</mnm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Bajdik</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Gilks</snm><fnm>CB</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>6143</fpage><lpage>6151</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0429</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15448001</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Nuclear beta-catenin in mesenchymal tumors</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ng</snm><fnm>TL</fnm></au><au><snm>Gown</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Barry</snm><fnm>TS</fnm></au><au><snm>Cheang</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au><au><snm>Chan</snm><fnm>AK</fnm></au><au><snm>Turbin</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Hsu</snm><fnm>FD</fnm></au><au><snm>West</snm><fnm>RB</fnm></au><au><snm>Nielsen</snm><fnm>TO</fnm></au></aug><source>Mod Pathol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>68</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/modpathol.3800272</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15375433</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>TMA Reviewer</p></title><url>https://www.gpecimage.ubc.ca/tma/web/viewer.php</url></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Receptors induce chemotaxis by releasing the betagamma subunit of Gi, not by activating Gq or Gs</p></title><aug><au><snm>Neptune</snm><fnm>ER</fnm></au><au><snm>Bourne</snm><fnm>HR</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>94</volume><fpage>14489</fpage><lpage>14494</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.94.26.14489</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">25031</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9405640</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Beta-arrestin2 is critically involved in CXCR4-mediated chemotaxis, and this is mediated by its enhancement of p38 MAPK activation</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sun</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Cheng</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Ma</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Pei</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>J Biol Chem</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>277</volume><fpage>49212</fpage><lpage>49219</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M207294200</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12370187</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Automated quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor expression in breast carcinoma does not differ from expert pathologist scoring: a tissue microarray study of 3,484 cases</p></title><aug><au><snm>Turbin</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Leung</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Cheang</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au><au><snm>Kennecke</snm><fnm>HA</fnm></au><au><snm>Montgomery</snm><fnm>KD</fnm></au><au><snm>McKinney</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Treaba</snm><fnm>DO</fnm></au><au><snm>Boyd</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Goldstein</snm><fnm>LC</fnm></au><au><snm>Badve</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Gown</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Rijn</snm><mnm>van de</mnm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Nielsen</snm><fnm>TO</fnm></au><au><snm>Gilks</snm><fnm>CB</fnm></au><au><snm>Huntsman</snm><fnm>DG</fnm></au></aug><source>Breast Cancer Res Treat</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>110</volume><fpage>417</fpage><lpage>426</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s10549-007-9736-z</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17912629</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma</p></title><aug><au><snm>Abd El-Rehim</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Pinder</snm><fnm>SE</fnm></au><au><snm>Paish</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Bell</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rampaul</snm><fnm>RS</fnm></au><au><snm>Blamey</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au><au><snm>Robertson</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Nicholson</snm><fnm>RI</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellis</snm><fnm>IO</fnm></au></aug><source>Br J Cancer</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>91</volume><fpage>1532</fpage><lpage>1542</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.bjc.6602184</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2410019</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15480434</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Prognostic and predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor in recurrent breast cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Tsutsui</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Kataoka</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ohno</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Murakami</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Kinoshita</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hachitanda</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>3454</fpage><lpage>3460</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12429634</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>c-erbB-2/EGFR as dominant heterodimerization partners determine a motogenic phenotype in human breast cancer cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Brandt</snm><fnm>BH</fnm></au><au><snm>Roetger</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Dittmar</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolai</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Seeling</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Merschjann</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Nofer</snm><fnm>JR</fnm></au><au><snm>Dehmer-Moller</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Junker</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Assmann</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Zaenker</snm><fnm>KS</fnm></au></aug><source>FASEB J</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>1939</fpage><lpage>1949</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10544177</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>Hormonal factors and the risk of breast cancer according to estrogen- and progesterone-receptor subgroup</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cotterchio</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kreiger</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Theis</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Sloan</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Bahl</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>1053</fpage><lpage>1060</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14578142</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival</p></title><aug><au><snm>Onitilo</snm><fnm>AA</fnm></au><au><snm>Engel</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Greenlee</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au><au><snm>Mukesh</snm><fnm>BN</fnm></au></aug><source>Clin Med Res</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3121/cmr.2009.825</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2705275</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19574486</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in primary breast cancer: results of a 10 year follow-up study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Klijn</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Look</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Portengen</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Alexieva-Figusch</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>van Putten</snm><fnm>WL</fnm></au><au><snm>Foekens</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au></aug><source>Breast Cancer Res Treat</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00666183</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">8018964</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>Integrin alpha 3 beta 1 participates in the phagocytosis of extracellular matrix molecules by human breast cancer cells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Coopman</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au><au><snm>Gehlsen</snm><fnm>KR</fnm></au><au><snm>Mueller</snm><fnm>SC</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Biol Cell</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>1789</fpage><lpage>1804</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">276026</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8930900</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>Requirement for Arf6 in breast cancer invasive activities</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hashimoto</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Onodera</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Hashimoto</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Tanaka</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hamaguchi</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Yamada</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sabe</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>6647</fpage><lpage>6652</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0401753101</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">404099</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15087504</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>ARF6 stimulates clathrin/AP-2 recruitment to synaptic membranes by activating phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type Igamma</p></title><aug><au><snm>Krauss</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kinuta</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Wenk</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>De Camilli</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Takei</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Haucke</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>J Cell Biol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>162</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>124</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1083/jcb.200301006</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2172713</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12847086</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>Beta-catenin, a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer: its roles in cyclin D1 expression and cancer progression</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lin</snm><fnm>SY</fnm></au><au><snm>Xia</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>Kwong</snm><fnm>KY</fnm></au><au><snm>Spohn</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Wen</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Pestell</snm><fnm>RG</fnm></au><au><snm>Hung</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>97</volume><fpage>4262</fpage><lpage>4266</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.060025397</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">18221</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10759547</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>Steroid receptors and their role in the biology and control of breast cancer growth</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cordera</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Jordan</snm><fnm>VC</fnm></au></aug><source>Semin Oncol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>33</volume><fpage>631</fpage><lpage>641</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.08.020</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17145341</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>Tumor variants by hormone receptor expression in white patients with node-negative breast cancer from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database</p></title><aug><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>WF</fnm></au><au><snm>Chu</snm><fnm>KC</fnm></au><au><snm>Chatterjee</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Brawley</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Brinton</snm><fnm>LA</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Oncol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>19</volume><fpage>18</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11134191</pubid></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
